Friday, 22 November 2013

Textual Analysis (Back to the Future)

The title of the film I am going to analyse is Back to the Future and it was released on the 3rd July 1985. This film was directed by Robert Zemeckis and produced by Steven Spielberg. The genre of Back to the Future is science-fiction and the sub-genre is comedy.

Below is the link for the trailer:

Todorov’s equilibrium model can be used to apply to the narrative in Back to the Future. The film’s equilibrium is during the beginning of the film as it shows a young man’s ordinary day where he late for school, hanging about his with girlfriend and having dinner with his family This shows that this is a normal routine for the protagonist, Marty. At dinner, his mother, Lorraine talks about how she and Marty’s father, George first fell in love when her father knocked him over with his car.


The disruption follows when Marty goes out late at night to meet his friend, Doc who is a scientist. Doc presents a DeLorean transformed into a time machine powered by plutonium, which supplies 1.21 gigawatts of power. He plans his first trip, but is prevented when the Libyans arrive in a van and shoot him. Marty escapes using the DeLorean and accidentally activates the time machine.


The recognition in the film occurs when Marty picks up a newspaper and realises that he is in 1955. Marty meets his father, George but as a teenager who is bullied by Biff. George is about to be hit by Lorraine's father's car when Marty pushes him out of the way and is knocked over instead. As a result, Lorraine falls for Marty instead of George. Marty goes to find Doc telling him he is from the future and needs help returning to 1985.


The repair takes place when Marty plans to have George "rescue" Lorraine however this plan fails when Biff shows up. George arrives to rescue her from Marty but finds Biff and yet stands up to him for the first time and knocks him out. Lorraine follows George back to the dance where they kiss assuring Marty’s existence. Marty arrives at the clock tower for his return back to the future. This brings on a chain of events before the new equilibrium is reached.


The new equilibrium of the film is when Marty wakes up the next morning to find that his family has completely changed. He reunites with his girlfriend Jennifer when Doc arrives insisting they come with him to the future to sort out a problem with their future children. Marty and Jennifer enter the DeLorean with Doc and depart for the future. This makes the film open because even though the film is eventually brought to a conclusion, Doc, Marty and Jennifer going to the future shows there is more events that will take place.


Back to the Future is a film that is in a non-chronological order, so the events in the film are not necessarily in the right order e.g. Marty’s parents are shown as adults then teenagers, then adults again. This is mainly because of the time travelling that takes place in the film. Also, Back to the Future has a restricted narrative because we see the film through Marty’s point of view.

Levi Strauss’ theory of binary oppositions can also be applied to the narrative structure of this Back to the Future. One example in this film is between the strange things that are in the film like the excessive amount of clocks in one room at the beginning of the film compared to the near end where there is only one clock which is normal.


The character, Marty is typical of the science-fiction genre because he is a protagonist that lives his life as a normal teenager and suddenly put back in time to change his and his parents’ present day by overcoming the antagonist, Biff. Also Marty’s girlfriend, Jennifer is typical of the science-fiction genre because she is a character that is unaware of the time-travelling until the end of the film when Doc tells them to come with him back to the future.

Doc is typical of the science fiction genre as he is a scientist. This character is hegemonic representation of a scientist and is typical through his costume, hair and make-up. Doc is wearing a white lab coat which is heavily associated with scientists and the science-fiction genre. Also his hair is white and reminiscent to Albert Einstein who was a very well-known scientist as well. In terms of behaviour, Doc is quite wacky and that is typical to the sub-genre of this film which is comedy. 

The facial expressions and body language of the characters in Back to the Future is representative of this genre because they symbolise the shock and disbelief shown by the characters that are not used to the conventions of the science-fiction genre like time-travel and technology.

In the beginning of the film, there is a medium shot of a clock and as the camera zooms out and pans and you can see more different clocks. This prop is typical of the science fiction genre as it shows that time is an important feature in this film.

The storyline is very typical of the science-fiction genre because the characters are often placed accidently in the past or future to change something that affects the present day, most of the time for the better. In this case, Marty goes back in time by 30 years and changes it so that his parents are better off than they were before. Also themes in science fiction films like the advancement in technology from the past to the future is typical of the genre such as the video camera. The story also explores time travel which is very typical of the science fiction genre. 

There is an extract in the film when a chase takes place between Marty and Biff with his friends.


At the start of this extract, George is talking to Lorraine and there’s a medium shot when Biff enters the parlour with his gang. When this happens it cuts to a medium close up of Marty. His facial expression suggests that he is angry at his presence and confirms it by swearing (‘shit’). This is a stereotypical representation of age because his use of language shows that he is rebellious and this is the way most teenagers are portrayed as in the media.


When Biff walks towards Ma 

Thursday, 7 November 2013

Recce Report



The majority of our short film, Out of the Blue, will be set in a college location. Our target audience being 12-25 year olds, will mean that the majority of the audience will possibly be students, or have been a student no too long ago, and so they will be able to relate well to the college setting.



For the argument characters Kate and Lily are going to have we chose a location within the college with a bench. This is so that the characters can sit together and appear to be spending time with each other in college during their break, as college students do, again relating to the target audience, as they would be familiar with this. We will also film Kate and Lily talk here at the end of the film, because Kate would have travelled back in time, to the beginning of the argument. Also when Kate goes missing and Lily looks at an article about her disappearance she will sit on the same bench, this is because it would have been the last location that Lily would have seen Kate.




Another location we plan to use is the corridor, this is because it leads to the next location, which will be a classroom. We have also chosen to film in the corridor due to the door at the start of it; we wish to show the character Caroline come through the door on a number of occasions to communicate to the audience how the main actor Kate time travels.



As stated previously, the corridor then leads to the next location, the classroom. This is were we have planed for Kate to find a watch. The title we have chosen for our short film is Out of the Blue, this in relation to the fact that the narrative is about the main character, Kate, finding a watch out of the blue. We feel that an empty classroom is a suitable location for finding a watch that enables Kate to time travel out of the blue, whilst still being a realistic location for an ordinary college student to take a watch from (It’s unlike for a college student to take a watch they find in a park or off the street).



We then plan to show how Kate uses the watch selfishly and so casually that it becomes a part of normal life for her and so have decided to create a montage to communicate this to the audience. The first location for the montage we've chosen is the park, to show the audience a different setting to college. Also college students do go outside of college on their breaks too and so we wanted to show this too.





The next montage location is the entrance and exit of the college. One of the scenarios we plan to show is Kate trying to leave the college, but having forgot her ID Card on a bench inside college, this being another location, she then goes back in time to get it.



The last location we plan to use in the montage sequence is a sitting area within the college. Kate is going to be sat in the sitting area when character Caroline appears; at first Kate doesn't notice her and so for this to work there would have to be more than one bench with a good amount of space between them, this location fits what we need and so has been chosen. 



Kate then time travels and finds herself at the park where character Lily dies. We feel that it would be suitable to the location where Lily’s dies not to be a location within college as the majority of the films locations will be filmed within college locations. However this being a significant scene would be better filmed in a different location to empathises its importance.

Production Schedule

Production Company: Time Productions                                       Date: October 2013

Director: Valencia Tyrell                                                     

Crew: Devina, Didem and Farjima

Pre-Production
Task
Dates
Details of Activities
Pitch


The entire group created the pitch to present our initial ideas about our short film in terms of narrative and structure e.g. how we could apply Todorov's equilibrium model. We thought about our possible target audience and how this film could apply to them through genre etc. The use of camera, mise-en-scene, sound and editing were considered as well. Also our pitch included hand-drawn drafts of our potential film poster. We received feedback on our pitch.
Proposal

Valencia did a proposal for our film. This was a description of our film listing the synopsis, the purpose and the target audience.
Treatment

Valencia also did the treatment which was a description of our narrative structure and how we planned to use camera, sound, editing and mise-en-scene.
Audience profile

I (Devina) did the audience profile. I wrote about a member of our target audience in detail including their hobbies, their age, what school they attend etc. I also wrote about a member from our secondary audience.                                                                                                 
Resources for Mise-en-scene

Farjima did this and she explained what resources such as props and locations were going to be used in our film.
Textual analysis

The whole group had to do an individual analysis of a film of a similar genre to our film.
Script

Valencia wrote the script and this was the dialogue in our film, with the scene descriptions such as facial expressions, movements etc.
Shot list

Farjima and Valencia completed the shot list. This was the camera angles, camera movements and shot sizes in our film.
Storyboard

These are the drawings of each shot that was outlined in our shot list for our film. This is done by Valencia.
Reece report

These were photographs of all of our locations, explaining why we are using the location and also analysing any possible problems with the locations.
Risk assessment

Devina completed the risk assessment. This was done so we could identify any problems that could arise while shooting our film.
Titles and credits

Devina also did wrote the title and credits and this was a list of people that was involved in the making of the film.
Production (filming days)
First cut
12/10/2013

Second cut


Final cut


Post-production
Log and transfer


Rough Cut


Audience response


Soundtrack preparation


Graphic preparation


Second cut



Final Cut Deadline: 06/12/2013

Annotation of Film Review Layout

Storyboard

















Risk Assessment


Student Name

Devina Serebour

Course

Media Studies

Location

College/local park 
Below is a list of Health & Safety considerations. Tick ones that apply to your shoot or location and elaborate in the box provided.
FIRE EXITS
X
ANIMALS

FIRE EXTINGUISHERS
X
COMPRESSED GAS

FIRE ALARMS
X
CONFINED SPACES

TRAINED 1ST AIDER
X
FIRE/FLAMMABLE MATERIAL

1ST AID BOX
X
DERELICT BUILDING

LECTURER PRESENT
X
FIGHT SEQUENCE

LIGHTS
X
GLASS
X
CABLES

HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS/DRUGS

ELECTRICS/GAS

MACHINERY

EXPLOSIVES/PYROTECHNICS/FIRE FX

VEHICLES

GRIP EQUIPMENT

WATER
X
SCAFFOLDS

WEATHER
X
SMOKE EFFECTS

WORKING AT HEIGHTS

STUNTS

OTHER
X

Students are not allowed to take replica weapons e.g. fake guns/knives to or from the college. Replica weapons must be used in a controlled environment, i.e. on the college grounds under teacher supervision or in the privacy of your own home. Using replica weapons on campus without permission from your teachers will result in disciplinary action.
You are not allowed to film using weapons in public under any circumstance.

Will you be using any props that could be perceived as weapon in your production?       YES          NO
If yes, please list below:


We will not be using any props that would be considered as a weapon.














Student Signature: Devina                                                           Student ID: 20121619

Technician Signature: ………………………………………     Date: September 2013